<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Topics tagged with rfc7565]]></title><description><![CDATA[A list of topics that have been tagged with rfc7565]]></description><link>https://bbs.spacc.eu.org/new/tags/rfc7565</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2026 21:29:26 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://bbs.spacc.eu.org/new/tags/rfc7565.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Where is the #Fediverse &quot;#handle&quot; syntax, @name@example.com, formally defined?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Where is the <a href="https://mstdn.ca/tags/Fediverse" rel="tag">#<span>Fediverse</span></a> "<a href="https://mstdn.ca/tags/handle" rel="tag">#<span>handle</span></a>" syntax, @name@example.com, formally defined? I don't see it in the W3C <a href="https://mstdn.ca/tags/ActivityPub" rel="tag">#<span>ActivityPub</span></a> spec, nor in <a href="https://mstdn.ca/tags/RFC7565" rel="tag">#<span>RFC7565</span></a>, the <a href="https://mstdn.ca/tags/Webfinger" rel="tag">#<span>Webfinger</span></a> 'acct' URI scheme spec. Is it a <a href="https://mstdn.ca/tags/Mastodon" rel="tag">#<span>Mastodon</span></a> convention which became universal? I am writing software to study handles, and I would rather base it on a spec than a social convention.</p>]]></description><link>https://bbs.spacc.eu.org/new/topic/bd84d032-4237-4c15-be51-9f9ea018fc19/where-is-the-fediverse-handle-syntax-@name@example.com-formally-defined</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bbs.spacc.eu.org/new/topic/bd84d032-4237-4c15-be51-9f9ea018fc19/where-is-the-fediverse-handle-syntax-@name@example.com-formally-defined</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[jdlh@mstdn.ca]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item></channel></rss>