<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[It was insanely inconvenient.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>It was insanely inconvenient.</p>

<div class="row"><img class="img-thumbnail" src="https://media.mstdn.social/media_attachments/files/116/525/698/047/450/027/original/a367d2d16c8518e0.jpg" alt="Link Preview Image" /></div>]]></description><link>https://bbs.spacc.eu.org/new/topic/6030c2f1-f40f-4ea2-bf2a-109e5c64d231/it-was-insanely-inconvenient.</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 01:51:40 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://bbs.spacc.eu.org/new/topic/6030c2f1-f40f-4ea2-bf2a-109e5c64d231.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 04:17:33 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to It was insanely inconvenient. on Wed, 06 May 2026 06:36:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/lowqualityfacts%40mstdn.social">@<span>lowqualityfacts</span></a></span> I just had to fact-check this, and actually I can confirm it's true.</p><p>2.6 (miles/kWh) * (2 Ah * 1.4 V) to feet ---&gt; 38 ft + 5.2608 in</p><p>and that's with the average fuel economy of a modern car, so it's reasonable that older one did a bit worse.</p><p>(I've assumed just one AA battery, maybe they actually run on two or three, and had a much worse fuel economy?)</p>]]></description><link>https://bbs.spacc.eu.org/new/post/https://social.gl-como.it/objects/3e3ce0df-1469-fae1-5f96-8e3981181509</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bbs.spacc.eu.org/new/post/https://social.gl-como.it/objects/3e3ce0df-1469-fae1-5f96-8e3981181509</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[valhalla@social.gl-como.it]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 06:36:15 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>