<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[JavaScript broke the web (and called it progress)]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>JavaScript broke the web (and called it progress) </p><p><a href="https://www.jonoalderson.com/conjecture/javascript-broke-the-web-and-called-it-progress/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"><span>https://www.</span><span>jonoalderson.com/conjecture/ja</span><span>vascript-broke-the-web-and-called-it-progress/</span></a> </p><p>«<br />Most websites are awful… They load slowly, render erratically, and hide their content behind megabytes of JavaScript. They glitch on mobile. They frustrate users and confuse search engines. They’re impossible to maintain. And somehow, we’re calling this progress.</p><p>The tragedy is, none of this is necessary. Once upon a time, we had a fast, stable, resilient web. But we replaced it with a JavaScript cargo cult.<br />»</p>]]></description><link>https://bbs.spacc.eu.org/new/topic/9d2bf54f-4c11-46f1-8299-3a243f6a1cfe/javascript-broke-the-web-and-called-it-progress</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 22:17:49 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://bbs.spacc.eu.org/new/topic/9d2bf54f-4c11-46f1-8299-3a243f6a1cfe.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2025 14:59:07 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>