<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Goddammit, Google is once again less than useful (sew!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Goddammit, Google is once again less than useful (sew! I mean sew! not embroider!), so here's my question for everyone who knows more about sewing than I do:</p><p>I want to attach letters to a jacket. I want to cut these letters out from reflecting tape, for reasons. And for fraying reasons, and a neater finish, I would like there to not be any raw edges.</p><p>And I'm not sure how to do that.</p><p>Turning the raw edges under is one option, but since letters tend to have a lot of curves and reflecting plastic fabric probably doesn't take well to ironing, that's gonna be a mess of puckering.</p><p>I thought of using a <em>very</em> small zigzag to attach them (all but buttonhole density), but that's gonna eat through miles of thread and not look very neat.</p><p>There's probably no way to cleanly turn something like a letter A outside out, even if I stencil around the opening.</p><p>Idk, am I missing some brilliant, obvious solution here? And if not, what would you go for?</p><p><a href="https://eldritch.cafe/tags/Sewing" rel="tag">#<span>Sewing</span></a> <a href="https://eldritch.cafe/tags/AskFedi" rel="tag">#<span>AskFedi</span></a></p>]]></description><link>https://bbs.spacc.eu.org/new/topic/abfc483e-a3fc-47ff-ae14-7dc80b1dc6d5/goddammit-google-is-once-again-less-than-useful-sew</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 20:36:51 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://bbs.spacc.eu.org/new/topic/abfc483e-a3fc-47ff-ae14-7dc80b1dc6d5.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2025 20:48:49 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Goddammit, Google is once again less than useful (sew! on Sat, 19 Jul 2025 06:03:54 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<span><a href="/user/oblomov%40sociale.network">@<span>oblomov</span></a></span> I think that <span><a href="/user/elfkin%40woof.group">@<span>elfkin</span></a></span> already gave quite a good answer]]></description><link>https://bbs.spacc.eu.org/new/post/https://social.gl-como.it/objects/3e3ce0df-1168-7b35-4ab3-ddd975144438</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bbs.spacc.eu.org/new/post/https://social.gl-como.it/objects/3e3ce0df-1168-7b35-4ab3-ddd975144438</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[valhalla@social.gl-como.it]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2025 06:03:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Goddammit, Google is once again less than useful (sew! on Fri, 18 Jul 2025 02:53:34 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/valhalla%40social.gl-como.it">@<span>valhalla</span></a></span> ping. ^ looks like something in your area of expertise</p><p><span><a href="https://eldritch.cafe/@amberage">@<span>amberage</span></a></span></p>]]></description><link>https://bbs.spacc.eu.org/new/post/https://sociale.network/users/oblomov/statuses/114871973589384098</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bbs.spacc.eu.org/new/post/https://sociale.network/users/oblomov/statuses/114871973589384098</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[oblomov@sociale.network]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2025 02:53:34 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>