<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[If Unregistered HyperCam 2 is so good, why haven&#x27;t they made Unregistered HyperCam 3?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>If Unregistered HyperCam 2 is so good, why haven't they made Unregistered HyperCam 3?</p>]]></description><link>https://bbs.spacc.eu.org/new/topic/bf6bb0c5-319d-4cb6-86f8-5d27fbd96a4c/if-unregistered-hypercam-2-is-so-good-why-haven-t-they-made-unregistered-hypercam-3</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2026 13:08:14 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://bbs.spacc.eu.org/new/topic/bf6bb0c5-319d-4cb6-86f8-5d27fbd96a4c.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2025 19:57:21 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to If Unregistered HyperCam 2 is so good, why haven&#x27;t they made Unregistered HyperCam 3? on Tue, 02 Sep 2025 08:27:20 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/esheep%40sh.monstergirls.live" rel="nofollow noopener">@<span>esheep</span></a></span> they have, actually, and it had exactly the watermark you'd expect</p>]]></description><link>https://bbs.spacc.eu.org/new/post/https://a.junimo.party/users/steffo/statuses/115131265885178913</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bbs.spacc.eu.org/new/post/https://a.junimo.party/users/steffo/statuses/115131265885178913</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[steffo@a.junimo.party]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2025 08:27:20 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>