Awesome, thanks, that helps me learn!
mycotropic@beige.party
@mycotropic@beige.party
Now with less personal identification due to babka.social doxxing and less science due to the February 2024 triumph of #Enshitification embodied by #CDCSays
done with kolektiva.social as well
same with libertarians.communitynetwork.space
All posts delete in 1 week
#Authors
#MarthaWells #Murderbot
#JulesVerne #TimPratt #ChristopherRowley #KurtVonnegut
#Archery #HorseBow
#Tiki #Cats #Antifa
He/Him if anyone cares
All photography is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.en
Ultimi post creati da mycotropic@beige.party
-
RE: Ecco un toot con un link che non c'entra per nulla:postato in Uncategorized
-
RE: Ecco un toot con un link che non c'entra per nulla:postato in Uncategorized
Different social motivation for using the platform perhaps? I perceive the people I interact with as friends and possibly collaborators and I enjoy the differences as much or more than the similarities! I think that some people use social media to identify groups with borders around them and others use social media to identify with the whole world simultaneously.
Something like that? -
RE: Ecco un toot con un link che non c'entra per nulla:postato in Uncategorized
We traveled to Umbria to visit my daughter who is studying in Perugia. I listened to #CoffeeBreakItalian in the car for hours in preparation and when we returned to the US the news was so goddamn annoying that I just repeated the whole series! I will never be good at the language but I really like trying and failing because every once in a while I get some small thing correct! La pratica rende perfetti*!
*Spelling corrected by the internets, I thought it was "la practical render perfecti"!
-
RE: Ecco un toot con un link che non c'entra per nulla:postato in Uncategorized
I recognize the infinitive form of Wrong*!! Yay!! Thank you!!!
Is "to do wrong" the same as "to be wrong"?* Copied to my special Notepad document titled "Italian".
-
RE: Ecco un toot con un link che non c'entra per nulla:postato in Uncategorized
"Obviously I'm doing something wrong but I don't know what."
Could you help me understand how this sentence works in Italian? Sbaglio and qualcosa in particular.
Qualcosa must be 'wrong' but is sbaglio 'something'?
Grazie!
-
“All we want is voter ID.postato in Uncategorized
“All we want is voter ID. You go to a grocery store, you have to give ID. You go to a gas station, you give ID," he continued, falsely, unless he's talking about buying alcohol.
-
Today I'm recording my Injury lecture for my public health freshmen.postato in Uncategorized
Today I'm recording my Injury lecture for my public health freshmen. It's interesting to point to the third leading cause of death in the US (2023) and tell them that this year the federal department responsible for protecting us, the CDC National Center for Injury Prevention (among others), lost more than half it's staff through layoffs and 2/3 when you consider all of the cuts.
I'm recording this lecture through clenched teeth, luckily the feedback from the students indicates that my fury at this idiocy is clearly reflected in their outrage.
-
RE: A fermentation byproduct might help to solve two major global challenges: world #hunger and the #environmental impact of fast fashion.postato in Uncategorized
Interesting; in Colorado we've used that waste product as food for bacteria in our #sewage treatment plants. Bacterial colonies fluctuate hourly and the less poop, the less bacteria. When people wake up at 6 for work a huge wave of #poop gets flushed into the treatment plant and it pushes pathogenic bacteria further into the system than they like. If they inject waste from the brewery into the upstream bacterial pool before the (predictable) poop-wave arrives then the colony grows large enough to handle the influx and the pathogenic bacteria get chomped up early.
Sewage treatment is pretty neat!
-
I would like to ask the Mastodon hive- mind a question about #StainedGlass.postato in Uncategorized
I would like to ask the Mastodon hive- mind a question about #StainedGlass. The background story is that I went to a giant yard sale/antique sale in Frankfurt West #Germany in 1986 or so and bought these two pieces. They went in to storage, they took some damage but now I want to know more about them and possibly have at least one of them repaired. I was told that they were pulled from a small church that was being demolished years before and they'd been in a basement for a couple of generations before this person sold them to me.
So does anyone have any idea what I have here? How old are they and should I cannibalize one of them to make the other into a better piece? I'd love to build one of them into the wall of a sunny room in my house or stabilize it, frame it and backlight it as an art piece.
These are three pictures of the same piece, the other one is missing the M shape center piece (broken) but is otherwise in tact.I look forward to your insights and any comments you choose to make and thank you for your time!


-
Today in grading undergraduate writing assignments;postato in Uncategorized
Today in grading undergraduate writing assignments;
"the journal name is real, the title is the real name of an article, the DOI is real, the authors are real… but nothing matches. For example, the DOI is not from the same article as the journal name, or title, or authors. Same with all other elements of the citation.
I think this is likely a Claude hallucination (rather than Chat GPT); Claude is known for doing a better job at pulling real citations or pulling real information to create a fake citation. "
So we assigned students a straightforward writing assignment; pick one of five proposed policy changes and write 500 words in support or in opposition to it. Two or three citations were required. No ChatGPT without sharing your original 500 words, your AI prompt , the resulting AI output and your final revision. 90% awesome, reasonable arguments for and against and then 10% that were essentially perfect.
We went into the citations via PubMed and other sources and found the above. So, obviously 10 points for that section and we indicated that we'd carefully evaluate all future work from the students with hallucinations, any further indication of AI use outside the syllabus will be zero on the assignment and a referral to student affairs for cheating.
So does anyone have any idea why these citations are f-ed up in this reproducibly awful way? Like, what is Claude doing wrong, exactly? It's like Claude is ALMOST identifying relevant work but it can't quite produce actual citations, just things that look like citations. It's like they missed the step where you actually have to READ THE DAMN PAPER YOU WANT TO CITE. Which it could do of course, it could ingest the whole paper, summarize it, simply pattern match versus the students writing and insert a valid doi link. Why is it making this specific error? Anyone?