Spacc BBS Spacc BBS
    • Categorie
    • Recenti
    • Tag
    • Popolare
    • Mondo
    • Utenti
    • Gruppi
    • Registrati
    • Accedi
    La nuova BBS è in fase Alpha. I post precedenti al 22 luglio 2024 potrebbero non essere trasferibili, ma rimarranno disponibili per la lettura su /old/.

    Moving topics

    Pianificato Fissato Bloccato Spostato Uncategorized
    forumwgactivitypub
    4 Post 3 Autori 0 Visualizzazioni
    Caricamento altri post
    • Da Vecchi a Nuovi
    • Da Nuovi a Vecchi
    • Più Voti
    Rispondi
    • Topic risposta
    Effettua l'accesso per rispondere
    Questa discussione è stata eliminata. Solo gli utenti con diritti di gestione possono vederla.
    • julian@community.nodebb.orgJ Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
      julian@community.nodebb.org
      ultima modifica di

      Within the context of threaded discussions, contexts (aka "topics", "posts", "threads", etc.) are associated with an audience (aka "forum", "category", "community", etc.).

      What happens currently when a context is moved from one audience to another? How does ActivityPub enabled software communicate this?

      I recently moved this topic from one category to another, and in doing so, realized that I have absolutely no idea what happens to the group association as seen by other software.

      @rimu@piefed.social also said in the other thread:
      > Also moving what NodeBB calls a topic (a post in Lemmy/PieFed) from what NodeBB calls a category (community in Lemmy/PieFed) into a different category (without spawning a new topic or leaving the old copy behind) is much needed but not implemented in Lemmy/PieFed/Mbin.

      One solution would be to federate an Update activity, though this is problematic because audience, the relevant field in question, is on its way out.

      Another solution would involve the Move activity, which would be an explicit signal that something moved somewhere. In this case, the Move would indicate the context moved to the new audience, or in AP software that have not implemented FEP 7888, then the top-level object will have moved to the new audience.

      cc @andrew_s@piefed.social @melroy@kbin.melroy.org @bentigorlich@gehirneimer.de @nutomic@lemmy.ml

      1 Risposta Ultima Risposta Rispondi Cita 0
      • bentigorlich@gehirneimer.deB Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
        bentigorlich@gehirneimer.de
        ultima modifica di

        @julian@community.nodebb.org I'd also use move...

        1 Risposta Ultima Risposta Rispondi Cita 0
        • trwnh@mastodon.socialT Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
          trwnh@mastodon.social
          ultima modifica di

          @julian wdym "audience is on its way out"? is this about lemmy not using it anymore?

          wrt a Move activity, i think it could work as long as the `actor` was authorized to modify both the current `context` and the new `target` context. i think the issue is mostly in side effects and if/when the `object` gets Updated afterward?

          julian@community.nodebb.orgJ 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta Rispondi Cita 0
          • julian@community.nodebb.orgJ Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
            julian@community.nodebb.org @trwnh@mastodon.social
            ultima modifica di

            @trwnh@mastodon.social yes, it is in regards to audience no longer being sent out by Lemmy. While it's defined in 1b12 it seems to be ancillary now, so updating that property would mean Lemmy would need to add support for it back.. not the end of the world.

            1 Risposta Ultima Risposta Rispondi Cita 0
            • Primo post
              Ultimo post