honestly the most implausible thing about this victorian novel so far, is not that someone can bring flesh back to life, it's that a woman has a dress with pockets (into which the incriminating item is placed).
-
honestly the most implausible thing about this victorian novel so far, is not that someone can bring flesh back to life, it's that a woman has a dress with pockets (into which the incriminating item is placed).
-
@drj It's a *pre* Victorian novel. And womens' dresses until the early 19th century were often cut to conceal a separate pocket, worn on a belt under the dress, with a slit to gain access to it.
(Social historical context makes a huge difference when reading historic—as opposed to historical—fiction.)
-
@cstross thanks. Not much coverage of 19th century British history in my maths degree, and I wasn't there. I did already know what a reticule is though. ;)
-
@drj If you want to know more about pockets in historical dress there is a book: The Pocket
A Hidden History of Women's Lives, 1660-1900 by Barbara Burman and Ariane Fennetauxspoiler: in those years pockets for women were quite a thing, and they were *big*. live-poultry-sized, even!
(except for those few years every century or so when people forgot about having a waist and had to resort to reticules :D )
