Spacc BBS Spacc BBS
    • Categorie
    • Recenti
    • Tag
    • Popolare
    • Mondo
    • Utenti
    • Gruppi
    • Registrati
    • Accedi
    La nuova BBS è in fase Alpha. I post precedenti al 22 luglio 2024 potrebbero non essere trasferibili, ma rimarranno disponibili per la lettura su /old/.

    A question for all non-Note focused #ActivityPub developers and thinkers:

    Pianificato Fissato Bloccato Spostato Uncategorized
    activitypub
    18 Post 7 Autori 12 Visualizzazioni
    Caricamento altri post
    • Da Vecchi a Nuovi
    • Da Nuovi a Vecchi
    • Più Voti
    Rispondi
    • Topic risposta
    Effettua l'accesso per rispondere
    Questa discussione è stata eliminata. Solo gli utenti con diritti di gestione possono vederla.
    • liaizon@social.wake.stL Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
      liaizon@social.wake.st @liaizon@social.wake.st
      ultima modifica di

      @linos @bonfire @pfefferle @smallcircles @evan @peertube @bookwyrm and additionally this makes me think: you should be able to reference (quote post) within a video object or quote an external video within an AP event

      1 Risposta Ultima Risposta Rispondi Cita 0
      • silverpill@mitra.socialS Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
        silverpill@mitra.social @liaizon@social.wake.st
        ultima modifica di

        @liaizon @linos @bonfire @pfefferle @smallcircles @evan @peertube @bookwyrm Mastodon can't do this but FEP-e232 implementations can embed multiple objects. I'll try to make two links here

        Video

        Poll

        linos@graz.socialL 2 Risposte Ultima Risposta Rispondi Cita 0
        • linos@graz.socialL Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
          linos@graz.social @silverpill@mitra.social
          ultima modifica di

          @silverpill Linking is good, I wonder if this can be fine tuned, to say whether to embed that target object or not. I guess it's maybe kind of related to quoting. I'll have to check quote implementations.

          1 Risposta Ultima Risposta Rispondi Cita 0
          • linos@graz.socialL Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
            linos@graz.social @silverpill@mitra.social
            ultima modifica di

            @andypiper As you wrote a FEP for quoting, I really wonder what you think: isn't it that linking, embedding and quoting have quite something in common, so shouldn't their implementations be derivatives from each other?

            @silverpill @liaizon @bonfire @smallcircles @evan @peertube

            smallcircles@social.coopS 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta Rispondi Cita 0
            • smallcircles@social.coopS Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
              smallcircles@social.coop @linos@graz.social
              ultima modifica di

              @linos @andypiper @silverpill @liaizon @bonfire @evan @peertube

              The issue I see with the Object Links FEP is that it boils down to: "If I know you adhere to the FEP, now I know to apply special logic to as:Link". May work well if we only do (micro)blogging. Is it a good general mechanism for a heterogeneous interoperable social web?

              I am thinking more of: "Use existing open standards". Web annotations comes to mind. Specifically an annotation motivatedBy linking.

              Link Preview Image
              Web Annotation Vocabulary

              favicon

              (www.w3.org)

              smallcircles@social.coopS linos@graz.socialL 2 Risposte Ultima Risposta Rispondi Cita 0
              • smallcircles@social.coopS Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                smallcircles@social.coop @linos@graz.social
                ultima modifica di

                @linos

                Btw, tangential.. some time ago I created this sketch to demonstrate a timeline having different types of AP objects on them. Not that that is the best UX, but because apparently everyone thinks in timeline widgets, so as a start :)

                And I just copied these notes to Social coding commons, which is themed to the less technical side of the social web, where people's needs are to be satisfied by the solutions we (co)create. By means of Social experience design. #SX

                Link Preview Image
                The composable service oriented fediverse

                This topic serves to explore a fediverse based on “app-free computing” where services are composed, choreographed and orchestrated into social experiences.

                favicon

                Discuss Social Coding (discuss.coding.social)

                1 Risposta Ultima Risposta Rispondi Cita 0
                • smallcircles@social.coopS Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                  smallcircles@social.coop @smallcircles@social.coop
                  ultima modifica di

                  @linos @andypiper @silverpill @liaizon @bonfire @evan @peertube

                  Btw, see also this fediverse idea started by @helge

                  Link Preview Image
                  Annotate Document

                  fediverse-ideas - Ideas for new applications and services on the Fediverse.

                  favicon

                  Codeberg.org (codeberg.org)

                  1 Risposta Ultima Risposta Rispondi Cita 0
                  • linos@graz.socialL Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                    linos@graz.social @smallcircles@social.coop
                    ultima modifica di

                    @smallcircles @andypiper @silverpill @liaizon @bonfire @evan @peertube

                    I wonder if Mastodon quotes aren't technically related more to embeds than "actual quotes". Cause what a Mastodon quote is doing is always referring to the whole quoted object (Note) without specifying where (and of course the consent, which is magnificent!). So maybe an embed could just be an extended Mastodon-quote where it is specified where it is in the content, e.g. via just using <embed> tags.

                    "actual quotes": being able to quote parts of something, putting it into context (where in content) and being referring to the whole origin source.

                    I see that we should continue this discussion on socialhub/the FEPs discussion places.

                    smallcircles@social.coopS renchap@oisaur.comR 2 Risposte Ultima Risposta Rispondi Cita 0
                    • smallcircles@social.coopS Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                      smallcircles@social.coop @linos@graz.social
                      ultima modifica di

                      @linos @andypiper @silverpill @liaizon @bonfire @evan @peertube

                      Yes agreed, the discussion should be started from a location where it federates to places where it is archived (forums), as the current conversation is ephemeral, and lost in history tomorrow, link-rotting :)

                      linos@graz.socialL 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta Rispondi Cita 0
                      • linos@graz.socialL Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                        linos@graz.social @smallcircles@social.coop
                        ultima modifica di

                        @smallcircles I didn't expect this to go so far, when posting at first... :)

                        smallcircles@social.coopS 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta Rispondi Cita 0
                        • smallcircles@social.coopS Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                          smallcircles@social.coop @linos@graz.social
                          ultima modifica di

                          @linos it is a good thing, for sure :)

                          Had discussions the other day on how federating SocialHub had a bunch of negative side effects. Most notably an overall shift of dev discussions to microblogging where it only increases fragmentation of the discussion, and less cohesion in the community.

                          Generally speaking "join the fediverse" is a bit meaningless, and we never really looked at the implications of federating. This is catching up in threadiverse efforts, but it is design after code.

                          julian@community.nodebb.orgJ 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta Rispondi Cita 0
                          • renchap@oisaur.comR Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                            renchap@oisaur.com @linos@graz.social
                            ultima modifica di

                            @linos We discussed "partial quotes" when working on quote posts, and decided not to explore this because you could easily change the text of what you are quoting to make it misleading but still attributed to the original author. Also it would probably have been good to have this discussion when we asked for comments, now we are deep into implementation and did not get much feedback when asked for it :(

                            @smallcircles @andypiper @silverpill @liaizon @bonfire @evan @peertube

                            1 Risposta Ultima Risposta Rispondi Cita 0
                            • julian@community.nodebb.orgJ Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                              julian@community.nodebb.org @smallcircles@social.coop
                              ultima modifica di

                              smallcircles@social.coop if you're not able to consume dev discussions on the fediverse and have to continually rely on people creating content on your platform then you need to raise that as an issue on your platform software.

                              1 Risposta Ultima Risposta Rispondi Cita 0
                              • Primo post
                                Ultimo post