Spacc BBS Spacc BBS
    • Categorie
    • Recenti
    • Tag
    • Popolare
    • Mondo
    • Utenti
    • Gruppi
    • Registrati
    • Accedi
    La nuova BBS è in fase Alpha. I post precedenti al 22 luglio 2024 potrebbero non essere trasferibili, ma rimarranno disponibili per la lettura su /old/.

    Is Safari intentionally excluded from the Service Worker installation?

    Pianificato Fissato Bloccato Spostato Uncategorized
    28 Post 4 Autori 103 Visualizzazioni
    Caricamento altri post
    • Da Vecchi a Nuovi
    • Da Nuovi a Vecchi
    • Più Voti
    Rispondi
    • Topic risposta
    Effettua l'accesso per rispondere
    Questa discussione è stata eliminata. Solo gli utenti con diritti di gestione possono vederla.
    • amaarets@community.nodebb.orgA Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
      amaarets@community.nodebb.org @baris@community.nodebb.org
      ultima modifica di

      > @baris said:
      >
      > @julian seems like safari is picky about replacing same notifs with tag, the PR on the repo has some code to handle safari via mergeId.
      >
      >
      > 00dd43ab-466c-4a37-baf1-3db217eae9c5-image.jpeg

      Indeed, the last commit was written with the aim of solving this problem, but it should be noted that after testing it did not help.

      I also do not have Safari to test, and I asked my friend to check with him (such a bad browser... it's a miracle I don't have one 😅 )

      I did not even remember opening a PR with these commits.

      I will now delete the last commit so that the effective code of the previous commits can be merged

      https://community.nodebb.org/assets/uploads/files/1778546927462-00dd43ab-466c-4a37-baf1-3db217eae9c5-image.jpeg

      1 Risposta Ultima Risposta Rispondi Cita 0
      • שניאור-שמח@community.nodebb.orgש Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
        שניאור-שמח@community.nodebb.org @amaarets@community.nodebb.org
        ultima modifica di

        @baris
        What's the end? Will you be able to fix this? Even though you don't have an iPhone?

        1 Risposta Ultima Risposta Rispondi Cita 0
        • baris@community.nodebb.orgB Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
          baris@community.nodebb.org @amaarets@community.nodebb.org
          ultima modifica di

          Yeah without an iphone it's not possible to test it, the change the in the PR looked good to me so if that don't work, I am out of ideas.

          שניאור-שמח@community.nodebb.orgש 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta Rispondi Cita 0
          • שניאור-שמח@community.nodebb.orgש Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
            שניאור-שמח@community.nodebb.org @baris@community.nodebb.org
            ultima modifica di

            @baris
            Thanks, I won't trouble you...
            As someone with an iPhone, I'll try to solve the problem myself...
            However, as the platform manager, I'd appreciate some direction from you:
            Do you have any idea how to test the issue?
            What is it related to? The plugin itself or the core?
            I'll try to investigate it myself, I just need a hint regarding what it might be connected to...
            Thanks!

            1 Risposta Ultima Risposta Rispondi Cita 0
            • baris@community.nodebb.orgB Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
              baris@community.nodebb.org @amaarets@community.nodebb.org
              ultima modifica di

              I think all the functionality is in nodebb-plugin-web-push. The notification is shown here https://github.com/NodeBB/nodebb-plugin-web-push/blob/main/static/web-push.js#L16. You can check there if every chat message push comes with a different body or if they are identical.

              julian@community.nodebb.orgJ 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta Rispondi Cita 0
              • julian@community.nodebb.orgJ Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                julian@community.nodebb.org @baris@community.nodebb.org
                ultima modifica di julian@community.nodebb.org

                @שניאור-שמח my best guess is that the notification is received by web push and it does not correctly "rescind" the push notification when issuing a new one with an identical merge id

                1 Risposta Ultima Risposta Rispondi Cita 0
                • שניאור-שמח@community.nodebb.orgש Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                  שניאור-שמח@community.nodebb.org
                  ultima modifica di

                  @julian
                  That's correct, but this change resolved the issue:

                  >Title:
                  >> Fix for Chat Notifications Merging Logic in src/notifications.js
                  >>
                  >Body:
                  >> Hi NodeBB team,
                  >> I wanted to share a fix for an issue where chat notifications were not merging correctly, resulting in multiple separate alerts instead of a single grouped notification (e.g., "3 new messages from user").
                  >> The Issue:
                  >> The core logic responsible for finding related notifications was sometimes failing to identify previous chat alerts, preventing them from being merged into a single summary notification.
                  >> The Solution:
                  >> We modified the merging logic in src/notifications.js to ensure that chat notifications are correctly identified and merged based on their unique identifiers.
                  >> Here is the corrected code block for the Notifications.push logic:
                  >> javascript >> if (notification.mergeId) { >> const related = await Notifications.findRelated([notification.mergeId], `uid:${uid}:notifications:unread`); >> const merged = await Notifications.getMultiple(related).then(Notifications.merge); >> if (merged.length) { >> notification = merged.pop(); >> notification.pushed = false; // Ensure it re-triggers the push for the update >> } >> } >> >>
                  >> Why this works:
                  >> By forcing notification.pushed = false after merging, we ensure that the updated notification (containing the new count and content) is sent out again, correctly reflecting the merged state to the user.
                  >> I hope this helps anyone experiencing similar issues with notification grouping!
                  >> Best regards.

                  The question is whether this is a professional and proper solution, or if it would be better to find a different one?

                  julian@community.nodebb.orgJ 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta Rispondi Cita 0
                  • julian@community.nodebb.orgJ Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                    julian@community.nodebb.org @שניאור-שמח@community.nodebb.org
                    ultima modifica di

                    @שניאור-שמח is that a pull request open to the plugin? I don't see it.

                    1 Risposta Ultima Risposta Rispondi Cita 0
                    • Primo post
                      Ultimo post