@tom I'm slowly working on one, but it's completely unpaid work.

thisismissem@hachyderm.io
@thisismissem@hachyderm.io
Tech Princess πΈπ» Feminist Politicker ππ»ββοΈ Fashionable Woman π Tooling Witch π
π Founder of https://unobvious.technology
Pro-Unions πͺπ» Trans & Queer π³οΈββ§οΈπ³οΈβπ
I currently work on Moderation and Trust & Safety tooling for the Fediverse.
Contributor to #Mastodon & other projects. You've probably used code Iβve written. Worked on the Fedi in 2018.
Berliner on New York time.
Advisor to IFTAS (https://about.iftas.org)
Ultimi post creati da thisismissem@hachyderm.io
-
RE: If I wanted to mess around with ActivityPub c2s clients what's a server I can host that has support for it?
-
RE: Recently there has been a lot of discourse about ActivityPub and AT Protocol which has been quite dividing and heated.
@ikuturso @mastodonmigration @breathOfLife @stefan there's plenty of DID methods that have been developed; There are some people using did:web, there's also did:webvh β but there's definitely still more work to do in this space.
I think ActivityPub could theoretically adopt did:web or did:webvh as an alternative to webfinger.
-
RE: Recently there has been a lot of discourse about ActivityPub and AT Protocol which has been quite dividing and heated.
@mastodonmigration @breathOfLife @ikuturso @stefan there's also NorthSky in Canada that's building on Blacksky's work, and I'm sure there'll be something similar in the EU too
-
RE: Recently there has been a lot of discourse about ActivityPub and AT Protocol which has been quite dividing and heated.
@mastodonmigration @breathOfLife @ikuturso @stefan this exists in the ATmosphere β https://tektite.cc/
and a demo video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_SdmiCRYeZA
-
RE: Recently there has been a lot of discourse about ActivityPub and AT Protocol which has been quite dividing and heated.
@mastodonmigration @breathOfLife @ikuturso @stefan Blacksky already recently managed a mass migration away from Bluesky hosted PDS's for their community. Similar could happen if needed for other communities.
-
RE: Recently there has been a lot of discourse about ActivityPub and AT Protocol which has been quite dividing and heated.
@tuxwise @nik I had reason to believe it was fine, anyway, it's been taken down and replaced with this statement: https://github.com/swicg/general/blob/master/statements/2025-09-05-activitypub-and-atproto-discourse.md
-
RE: Recently there has been a lot of discourse about ActivityPub and AT Protocol which has been quite dividing and heated.
@firesidefedi yeah, one could argue that, but there's so many other people building in the AT Protocol ecosystem that it'd only affect maybe one part of the network, there already exists alternative AppViews, Clients, Relays, and PDS's, especially if we look at the wonderful work from the Blacksky team (blackskyweb.xyz)
-
RE: Recently there has been a lot of discourse about ActivityPub and AT Protocol which has been quite dividing and heated.
@fediforum I could certainly run a session on this, as long as I have moderators to help.
-
RE: Recently there has been a lot of discourse about ActivityPub and AT Protocol which has been quite dividing and heated.
@jackwilliambell @j12t I'm not saying that it would be changed to support global authorities (though those already exist arguably), I'm saying that you can continue to have your own server and do whatever you want.
But I'm also saying that your server does not need to be your identity, and that data and identity can be separated from applications.
-
RE: Recently there has been a lot of discourse about ActivityPub and AT Protocol which has been quite dividing and heated.
@ahltorp I never said anything about liking them or not, I said I haven't seen much from them, and consequently they are not representative, especially when there's so many other people doing amazing work within the ATmosphere.