Spacc BBS Spacc BBS
    • Categorie
    • Recenti
    • Tag
    • Popolare
    • Mondo
    • Utenti
    • Gruppi
    • Registrati
    • Accedi
    La nuova BBS è in fase Alpha. I post precedenti al 22 luglio 2024 potrebbero non essere trasferibili, ma rimarranno disponibili per la lettura su /old/.

    It's becoming increasingly clear to me that Reflect Orbital's fucking stupid giant mirror satellite, with absolutely NOTHING useful to offer, which will cause countless safety issues, ecological disasters, and destroy the night sky, is going to launch.

    Pianificato Fissato Bloccato Spostato Uncategorized
    20 Post 2 Autori 3 Visualizzazioni
    Caricamento altri post
    • Da Vecchi a Nuovi
    • Da Nuovi a Vecchi
    • Più Voti
    Rispondi
    • Topic risposta
    Effettua l'accesso per rispondere
    Questa discussione è stata eliminata. Solo gli utenti con diritti di gestione possono vederla.
    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
      sundogplanets@mastodon.social @sundogplanets@mastodon.social
      ultima modifica di

      Large reflector cross-sections also mean a much higher collision risk from micrometeorites and non-trackable orbital debris. Using typical rates https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S027311772030644X at 625km altitude (the orbit RO proposes to use), such reflectors could expect hundreds of micrometeorite and debris impacts each year, quickly degrading the reflector and creating more diffuse and larger beams.

      sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta Rispondi Cita 1 0
      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
        sundogplanets@mastodon.social @sundogplanets@mastodon.social
        ultima modifica di

        There are already solutions right here on Earth to many of the problems “sunlight as a service” purports to solve. This approach is simply a reckless and inefficient use of Earth orbit, a precious and finite resource.

        This list of facts was developed by me and a bunch of very concerned astronomers. If you're a journalist interested in writing a news article about this, please look up my university email and contact me, and I'll be happy to chat.

        sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta Rispondi Cita 1 0
        • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
          sundogplanets@mastodon.social @sundogplanets@mastodon.social
          ultima modifica di

          What can you do? The FCC never opened up a comment period on RO's filing for launch, so there's no official way to protest. They may open it up later? Absolutely no info on that.

          DarkSky International is working on a petition to be delivered to RO's misguided investors, I will share that as soon as its public.

          Most important: tell people about all the downsides of "sunlight as a service." The world needs to know how incredibly bad this idea is.

          Batteries! We need batteries, not space mirrors.

          sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta Rispondi Cita 1 0
          • gustavinobevilacqua@mastodon.cisti.orgG gustavinobevilacqua@mastodon.cisti.org shared this topic on
          • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
            sundogplanets@mastodon.social @sundogplanets@mastodon.social
            ultima modifica di

            This article by two astronomers details many of the points I just talked about and more ways that Reflect Orbital's plan will never be feasible, just detrimental: now in The Conversation Australia, perfect timing: https://theconversation.com/a-us-startup-plans-to-deliver-sunlight-on-demand-after-dark-can-it-work-and-would-we-want-it-to-264323

            sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta Rispondi Cita 1 0
            • mycotropic@beige.partyM Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
              mycotropic@beige.party @sundogplanets@mastodon.social
              ultima modifica di

              @sundogplanets

              also isn't this equivalent to letting a private corporation have a solar powered energy weapon that can be used against any target.on the planet? Didn't Heinlein warn us about something similar in The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress when he said "don't put your prisoners at the top of the gravity well armed with a kinetic weapon powered by the sun and an entire moon full of ammunition?"

              1 Risposta Ultima Risposta Rispondi Cita 1 0
              • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                sundogplanets@mastodon.social @sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                ultima modifica di

                Adding to this Reflect Orbital thread: @startswithabang wrote a thorough analysis of all the ways that Reflect Orbital is a terrible idea. Have a read! https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/true-cost-solar-power-night-reflect-orbital/

                sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta Rispondi Cita 1 0
                • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                  sundogplanets@mastodon.social @sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                  ultima modifica di

                  Have I mentioned how much I like Nicole Mortillaro? Great article, includes quotes from @JohnBarentine (there were various good reasons why she didn't interview me for this one, but fortunately a lot of other astronomers besides me are really worried about Reflect Orbital's thoughtless plan)

                  Link Preview Image
                  Giant mirrors in space to reflect sunlight at night? No thank you, astronomers say | CBC News

                  A U.S. company is proposing to 'sell sunlight after dark,' saying it could help power solar farms and provide access to light in emergency situations. Astronomers are not only concerned about what this will do to the night sky, but also to wildlife.

                  favicon

                  CBC (www.cbc.ca)

                  Reflect Orbital is stupid and will cause countless problems with no measurable benefits.

                  sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta Rispondi Cita 0
                  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                    sundogplanets@mastodon.social @sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                    ultima modifica di

                    New article from Smithsonian Magazine about how stupid Reflect Orbital's plans are: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/giant-mirrors-in-space-could-bring-sunlight-after-dark-one-startup-says-and-astronomers-are-concerned-180987781/

                    Features interviews with me and several of my excellent astronomer colleagues on the American Astronomical Society Committee for the Protection of Astronomy and the Space Environment! Looks like Reflect Orbital has followed SpaceX's lead and stopped responding to journalist inquiries.

                    sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta Rispondi Cita 1 0
                    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                      sundogplanets@mastodon.social @sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                      ultima modifica di

                      I have doubts about whether or not change.org petitions actually do anything. But if you need to do something small right now against space mirrors, a DarkSky International member set up a petition here: https://www.change.org/p/stop-space-mirrors

                      sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta Rispondi Cita 0
                      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                        sundogplanets@mastodon.social @sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                        ultima modifica di

                        DarkSky International just posted their position letter on Reflect Orbital. It is direct and to the point:

                        "Based on current scientific evidence, DarkSky does not see a viable pathway for such systems to align with responsible lighting principles or with our mission to protect natural darkness. These systems would introduce significant ecological, human health, safety, and astronomical risks at a global scale."

                        Read their letter and add your name here:

                        Just a moment...

                        favicon

                        (darksky.org)

                        1 Risposta Ultima Risposta Rispondi Cita 1 0
                        • Primo post
                          Ultimo post